Jonny Magnanti is the first actor to interpret Tony Harrison’s still controversial poem,‘V’. Like Tony Harrison, Jonny Magnanti had a working class upbringing in Leeds. In his familiarity with the Leeds dialect, its cadences, and the reality of what for some at least is everyday speech, Magnanti took us right to Harrison’s parents’ municipal graveyard, daubed with swastikas and profanity and littered with discarded cans of Harp larger. For nearly an hour in three separate performances this week, thirty-odd people in the St Leonard pub in London Road were drawn-in to Harrison’s (or was it Magnanti’s?) private world where a painful internal dialogue took centre stage.
It’s probably debatable whether Harrison or Magnanti ‘but
for the grace of God’ would, minus an advanced education, have become Nazi
skinheads. In the mid-80s I remember unemployed northerners on the edge of, or
fully absorbed in, the black economy down south. They were angry but very
unlikely recruits to that particular form of working class politics. The dramatic
effect, however, of the polarity that Harrison writes, and Magnanti so
powerfully vocalises, is mining a rich seam indeed.
The strike of course hangs heavy over the poem and this
performance, as it does any recollection of the 1980s. Fetch Theatre, who
produced the performance, include brief audio interludes that politically and
musically soundtrack the decade. Margaret Thatcher’s voice, and its dogmatic
and propagandist interpretation of what the strike was about, still cuts to the
quick in its absolutist sense of what she believed, or wanted, to be at stake.
A warmer voice of a striking miner paradoxically becalms with its moving assertion
of the social dimension to what some saw as just an economic issue.
Harrison wasn’t expressing the ‘V’ for ‘Versus’ sentiment
that united many young Leeds men with their football team, and much else in
their culture, against whoever they were ‘losing to’ that week. Harrison’s
‘true’ voice says that the reference to Leeds football club, ‘United’, that had
been spray-painted on his parents’ grave could perhaps be left there. While
having no religious faith himself, he says that it could be a sentiment of hope
that they would, someday, be together again. More broadly, the poet expresses
in ‘V’ the wish that his nation could be united; not divided down the middle in
what is presented as a wilful exercise in class politics.
Magnanti gives expression to Harrison’s guilt upon making
one of his rare homecomings; not privileged but having escaped from the
miserable powerlessness that the poem argues spawns such ‘yobbos’. The
occupants of these tombs – butcher, baker and publican - would have wanted such
vandals punished, Harrison’s non-skin voice observes. His own Dad, elderly and
isolated, had felt increasingly alienated too, not recognising the city he grew
up in and uncomfortable at the presence of ‘coloureds’ (his father’s most
‘liberal’ term) whose culture he didn’t understand and whose shops obliged him
to walk ever further for a tin of baked beans. Leeds was, according to ‘V’,
‘beef, bread and beer’ and that is what was being played out, positively and
negatively, among the tombstones. There is much humanity and realism in
Harrison’s poem and in Magnanti’s telling of it, including language and
sentiment that can still be shocking, but now perhaps for an otherwise very
sympathetic audience.
I don’t think the poem’s telling is intended to evoke some
guilt in the audience. However Magnanti’s
delivery and the audio soundbites combined to trigger in me sharp memories of
the class-conscious politics of the time. I felt a familiar conflict between
total sympathy for miners resisting deliberate and spiteful socio-economic
engineering and contempt for those whose cynical political calculations helped lead them to
defeat. Thatcher’s self-serving ‘enemies of democracy’ rhetoric aimed at
working class industrial action did have a ring of truth for some, like me, on the compromising, trimming, centre-left. The poet detected where the Labour leadership was heading; two
references to the Leeds MP who led the Labour Party when Harrison was a much younger
man, Hugh Gaitskell, and his ‘smooth’ appeal to what the ‘other side’ wanted to
hear, were signposts of what was beginning to happen when ‘V’ was written.
Jonny Magnanti in 'V' - a portrait by Peter Mould www.stagesnaps.com |
If this performance of ‘V’ still makes people uncomfortable,
for the contemporary resonances of its subject matter, for its explanation of
where social resentment can come from, and because of the disconnect that
perhaps many of us feel from those at the sharp end, then it only proves the
poem’s abiding power and particularly this performance of it.
Jonny Magnanti said to me afterwards that the Leeds LitFest have not only thrilled him by inviting him to
perform ‘V’ there, but have asked him to sit on a discussion panel about it
with Tony Harrison. ‘You couldn’t make it up,’ he said. You couldn’t make up
the language and concerns of ‘V’ up either. Rooted in the real and poetically
connecting to other possibilities: not ‘Versus’ but ‘United’.
Fabulous article would you mind if we put a link to it on the 'V' page? Also I couldn't read your email you left on the night so if you can forward to fecththeatre@gmail.com that would be great.
ReplyDeleteJohn
Fetch Theatre
Many thanks John. By all means! The email is neilpartrick@hotmail.com
ReplyDeleteThis was a very emotional experience for me. The visceral flashbacks to the politics of the time, combined with the complex emotions raised by a familiar personal journey made me feel like leaving several times. But the phenomenal performance that made a St. Leonard's pub interior become a Leeds graveyard had me rooted to the spot. With just one inspired prop and a 'scene' succinctly punctuated with musical and political history, Jonny Magnanti managed to transform Tony Harrison's epic poem into a compelling and brilliant piece of theatre. Not something I am going to forget.
ReplyDeleteThank you Nature Strikes Back for your brilliantly concise comment (wish I could be so to the point!). Your personal take on how you felt watching the performance is moving and further shows how alive and relevant this piece of one man theatre was.
ReplyDelete